Blog by Sectoral Transparency Alliance on Natural Resource Governance in Cebu, Inc. (STANCE) In 2018, at the height of the local implementation of the UNDEF Project, a mountain collapsed taking away lives, a good number of them, I am afraid, will remain unknown. The tragic event struck a chord because it happened in an extractives area at a time when the UNDEF project is in full swing, engaging basic sector representatives to encourage them to find their voice as they slowly take their place in the spaces allocated to them within natural resource governance. As hushed whispers were exchanged, a clear picture was formed: nation building becomes
meaningful if communities and the women and men chosen to represent them undertake an ownership of their individual and collective roles contributing to a better world we all dream to give our children and their children. Such intergenerational project is only possible when the sources of power, even within natural resource governance, is so configured to be equally wielded by stakeholders with preference to those who are always at the margins. The UNDEF project stood on a terra firma of democratic values, providing space for those who often stand in awe opposite to power with very little opportunities to express their right to be recognized as part of the whole system of governance and resources allocation. Admittedly, the long road to paradigm shifts and institutional renovations is still a far horizon away. But change had been provoked, it is desired. The flames of hope had been ignited setting ablaze a process that seeks out transformations and liberations, of communities so empowered that at the heart of each one, change is already beginning to show its bud.
0 Comments
Read up on the experiences of indigenous community of Bataraza, Palawan in understanding mining related data disclosures through the Open Mining Governance project of Bantay Kita. Comics are available in English and Filipino. Find the link below to download. Download here:
Blog by Rose Ann Marie Paragas When we talk about empowerment of people, I always remember a professor and a mentor back in college who always remind us to define first what empowerment is. The Google dictionary would tell us that it is “giving power or authority to someone to do something”. Prior to that, other important questions would be: Who defines empowerment? Who empowers who? And, how does one promote empowerment? This has been the principle that caused carefulness, at least in my own journey as a project implementer, of the two-year Voice project entitled “Claiming Political Space: Amplifying Voices of Indigenous Peoples in Minerals Management”. With a quick glimpse of the project, I would assume that the empowerment we’re trying to achieve is to claim that political space which is probably lacking or limited among indigenous peoples – to allow them to meaningfully participate in decision making in the management of their minerals. One of the objectives of the project is to craft their Community Royalty Development Plan (CRDP) using an inclusive and participatory approach. The CRDP is a plan on how to manage the royalties received from mining operations, and prioritizing programs to which the indigenous community led by the Indigenous Peoples Organizations and/or the Indigenous Political Structure, shall allocate the funds. Supposedly, their CRDP should be based on their Ancestral Domain Sustainable Development Plans (ADSDPP). Consequently, the ADSDPP is a prerequisite for the indigenous groups to acquire a Certificate of Ancestral Domain Title (CADT). My experience at the community level allowed me to validate these assumptions. To start, it is important to establish that the indigenous peoples and indigenous cultural communities define what is empowerment for them. There is already power within them that only needs to be awakened and strengthened. This is primarily our role as development workers to facilitate such an awakening of spirit by journeying with them and for them.
This definition of empowerment goes beyond merely having a Community Royalty Development Plan (CRDP). To them, empowerment roots back to exercising self-determination over their ancestral domain, the whole spectrum of natural resource governance and the indigenous processes within their land. It is for this reason that in planning, the IP groups considered not only royalties from mining but from all other resources within the domain. To achieve this though, the IPs are faced with challenges that are internal to the group as well as external challenges that may be due to the lack and/or gaps in government policies and guidelines. Consequently, these challenges also need reconciliation of both internal and external controls and interventions to be addressed. In the case of Luzon particularly in Benguet and Palawan, it is safe to say that the indigenous peoples do have a political space or a platform to amplify their voices on minerals management and natural resource governance. There are existing Indigenous Peoples Organizations (IPO) whose members are supposedly part of the Indigenous Political Structure (IPS). Note that there is a need to establish the distinction between the two among IPs and ICCs. The IPS also designates the Indigenous Peoples Mandatory Representative (IPMR) in the local government units both at the barangay and municipal level. However, it was made apparent that these platforms need to be strengthened and/or widened. Achieving such a result includes reliving the IP Identity and the consciousness as individuals that work together as one unit united by their relationship to their land and their ancestors. One of the essential keys in strengthening such platforms is the installment of clear guidelines and policies from relevant government agencies, alongside, the support of civil society organizations in providing assistance for collaborative learning and education. At present, some IPs are not yet awarded with their Certificate of Ancestral Domain Titles (CADT). This is oftentimes due to the lack of the Ancestral Domain Sustainable Development and Protection Plan (ADSDPP). The creation of such a document needs resources which may be the main challenge among IP groups, such that of the Tagbanua and Palaw’an Tribe in Narra, Palawan. This also makes it even more challenging to craft a Community Royalty Development Plan (CRDP) which as per the guideline of the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) should be based on the ADSDPP. Even guidelines on CRDP is not in place at present. Having said these things, we know for a fact that there is so much work left for all stakeholders involved: the IPs, the government, the civil society, and other players. Dreaming about the empowerment of indigenous peoples in minerals management, collaborative actions must be done while still putting the interest of the IPs at the center of every decision making by allowing their voices to be heard and amplified. Bantay Kita supports legislative reforms to increase government revenue from the extractives industry. A mining fiscal regime should ensure the greatest possible benefit to support development and well-being of citizens.
The government should establish a fiscal regime that is simple, and transparent mainly due to the limited administrative capacity, and weak regulatory capacity on disclosure. We propose imposing 5% mineral royalty payments for all metallic mining operations which will be easier to administer, and by reason of that royalties are payments to the government for the minerals extracted. We support windfall profits tax to ensure revenue to government from excess profit of companies when international prices of resources soar. We support the introduction of new tax measures such as thin capitalization and ring-fencing to control tax avoidance of companies. However, a mining fiscal regime will only be effective and efficient by closely monitoring companies, and sustaining practice of transparency of both government and industry. Bantay Kita welcomes the creation of a Natural Resource Trust Fund. We propose that the Trust Fund shall be governed by a multi-stakeholder oversight body composed of representatives from the government, industry, and civil society. The oversight body shall advise concerned local government units on fund operations. The Trust Fund is subjected to disclosures to the Philippine Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (PH-EITI). It shall also be consistent with best practices of natural resource trust funds globally. Bantay Kita strongly supports the institutionalization of the PH-EITI. The EITI is the global standard to promote the open and accountable management of extractive resources. In 2017, the Philippines has been recognized internationally as the first country to achieve satisfactory progress against the EITI Standard. The EITI identified that the Philippines has gone beyond the minimum required by the EITI Standard. The PH-EITI must continue its work to improve governance of the extractive industry. We recommend that a portion or share of mining revenues shall fund the PH-EITI programs and activities. Finally, Bantay Kita supports this legislative reform on the mining fiscal regime only for the metallic mining. We believe that a different bill for the non-metallic industry which includes the coal industry should be filed. The Semirara Mining and Power Corporation, the major player in the coal industry do not exhibit any practice of good governance and have remain non-participant in PH-EITI for the past five years. Bantay Kita, a national coalition advocating for transparency and accountability in natural resource governance, calls on national government agencies to make its processes transparent, to hold genuine consultations from key stakeholders, and to recognize the right of indigenous peoples to a free and prior informed consent.
Last 20 June 2019, the financial or technical assistance agreement (FTAA) of OceanaGold Philippines, Inc. (OGPI) expired and is currently pending for renewal. However, the local government unit and mining-affected communities of Brgy. Didipio, Kasibu in Nueva Vizcaya were not made aware of the renewal application of the mining agreement of OceanaGold. Bantay Kita National Coordinator Pamela Grafilo said, “the Department of Environment and Natural Resources - Mines and Geoscience Bureau (DENR-MGB), as a member of the Philippine Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (PH-EITI), commits to uphold the principle of transparency, including the renewal process of any mining agreement.” The EITI Standard requires disclosure of information along the extractive industry value chain involving how extraction rights are awarded. Local government units and affected mining communities have the right to access to information regarding their natural resources. “As stakeholders of the PH-EITI, we urge the MGB to uphold its commitment to transparency on decision-making processes that affect communities as well as to genuine community engagement for sound natural resource governance”, said Pamela Grafilo. Today, as we celebrate the International Day of the World’s Indigenous Peoples, Bantay Kita reiterates its call to the relevant government agencies to uphold their processes in transparency and to recognize and respect any decision made by affected communities and the indigenous peoples. Bantay Kita also calls on the National Commission on Indigenous People (NCIP) to hold a participatory and inclusive free and prior informed consent process among cultural communities. A process that is free from any form of manipulation and provided a platform to be heard and attended to. The FPIC process shall serve as a safeguard to the right of the indigenous peoples to self-governance over their ancestral domain. |
Previous Posts
March 2023
Topics
All
|