Bantay Kita
  • Home
  • Updates
  • Resources
    • Videos
    • Presentations
    • Publications
    • Photos
    • Policies >
      • Current
      • Pending
    • Infographics
    • Modules
  • About Us

Statement on Committee Report No. 720 on the Proposed Mining Fiscal Regime

9/4/2023

2 Comments

 
Bantay Kita stands strong in opposing Mining Reform House Bill 8937 (Committee Report No. 720), for its deliberate measure to decrease the current mining royalties and shadowy provisions on profit-based royalties and windfall tax design. While the current mining fiscal regime lacks strong accountability measures to ensure human, environmental and economic due diligence within the Philippines’ mining industry, this proposed fiscal regime provides more protection from financial risks of mining companies and decreases wealth shares of mining host communities. 

Beyond the economic externalities of the proposed mining bill, HB 8937 will also lead to the intensification of social, environmental and cultural impacts of extraction upon mining-affected communities. 

Salient features of House Bill 8937 include:
  • lower royalty taxes on operations within mineral reservations from 5% to 3%;
  • introduces profit-based royalty as opposed to its current output-based structure on operations outside mineral reservations, with a complex multi-tiered structure from 1-5% tax implementations dependent on profit level, and
  • introduces profit-based windfall tax ranging from 1-10%. With the high profit threshold proposed, margin-based impositions apply only after companies are secured of at least 35% margins. This provision has effectively replaced mechanisms which ensure governments obtain at least 50% of mining proceeds under Financial or Technical Assistance Agreements (FTAAs) for foreign companies.

The increased complexity within the proposed mining fiscal regime poses detrimental consequences to exacerbating social, environmental and economic inequities across the nation. The proposed tax reforms have the potential to intensify inadequate transparency measures within mineral production and revenue agreements, calling for an increased risk of tax evasion and corruption. 

The Philippine mining sector contributes a minuscule 0.6% to the GDP, with large-scale mining provinces host to some of the nation’s highest poverty incidences. The alleged aim of the proposed fiscal regime is to raise national revenues within the mining industry. However, by alleviating tax burdens for corporations and dispossessing governments and local communities of their revenue share, the proposed tax reforms underline the government’s prioritization of corporate profit maximization at the expense of community livelihoods and critical ecosystems. 

Rapid scale-up of renewable energy remains a primary solution to addressing the climate crisis across nations and within the 2023 Philippine Energy Plan and 2023 Philippine Development Plan. A global and national energy transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy has called for the insatiable demand for critical minerals necessary to produce low carbon technologies. The Philippines is host to the fifth largest nickel reserves, and fourth largest copper and cobalt reserves, globally, which remain the leading raw materials for the production of green technologies. 

Mineral reservation areas are located in Dinagat Islands, Surigao del Sur, Surigao del Norte, Agusan del Norte, Palawan, and Tawi-Tawi, where the majority of the nation’s nickel reserves lie. These areas are host to some of the Philippines’ most biodiverse ecosystems yet remain amongst the most climate-vulnerable and economically marginalized. The decreased government and community shares in the proposed mining bill will challenge the current weaknesses of the government in the implementation of safeguards to protect mining-affected communities from the loss of critical ecosystems, watersheds, and livelihoods resulting from the increasing attractiveness of mining in the Philippines under the proposed mining reform and global transition mineral demand.

The nation is under increasing global pressure to provide the critical minerals necessary for the energy transition, with international and domestic corporations looking to expand transition mineral mining in the Philippines to capitalize on global demands. 

Moreover, the Philippines contributes 0.35% to global greenhouse gas emissions, yet remains amongst the top three nations most vulnerable to climate change. The alleviation of tax burdens remains a financial incentive for domestic and foreign investors to expand rampant mining operations in the Philippines. Increases in mining operations alongside a lack of human and environmental rights due diligence will lead to the continued devastation of critical climate mitigating ecosystems, leaving mining affected communities - and the nation as a whole - increasingly vulnerable to natural disasters, livelihood loss, and food insecurity. 

​Bantay Kita calls on the Congress to uphold public interests and reject House Bill 8937. 




2 Comments
Robert
9/15/2023 04:38:31 pm

I have just returned from Dinagat island and are discusted and appalled at what I saw. Mining is rife and is entering pristine wildlife areas. These are wild lands, undisturbed by man and rich in biodiversity. There seems to be no regard for the environment. This really needs to addressed.

Reply
Carlos Aberin
7/23/2025 12:54:32 pm

On the government share of revenues: the government seems reluctant to impose additional tax burden on the mining companies without offering something in return. That is the reason why the excise tax is proposed to change from 4% to 1-5%. There is a 1% swing if the prices go up, and up to 3% down swing if prices go down. Is that fair?

On the proposed government share of profits: This scheme is highly prone to corruption by the mining companies of government auditors. The excise tax on gross revenues is more advantageous to the government.

On the 0.6% mining share of the GDP, this might be attributed to reluctance of the government arm, the MGB, to exercise the full powers bestowed to it by the Philippine Mining Act of 1995 and its IRR. They are a far cry from their Indonesian counterpart, the AnTam. Every time the AnTam makes a move, the mining companies cower.

The Mining Technology Division of the MGB Central Office also seems helpless in performing its mandate of pushing the progress of mining technology. Just look up the list of research works completed by the agency on its website. The MTD accounts for ZERO research work. If nobody provides sound advice to the MGB Director in pushing for progress on mining technology, how can the MGB formulate effective solutions to increase government contribution to the GDP?

At the moment, only the gold and copper sectors of the industry can help by opening up new operations. However, new gold and copper operations take too long to complete. New nickel mining operations can be the alternative, but at the rate existing nickel mining operations are sustaining losses left and right due to the prevailing price of nickel, even adding a lot of new ones will not help in raising government share of the GDP.

If the MGB MTD cannot fulfill its mandate satisfactorily, the alternative is to partner with the private sector in doing so. The latter, with support and assistance from the government, can be in a good position to offer solutions because they have the actual experience to do so.

The MTD and the MGB should be open-minded to receive and evaluate initiatives and proposals from the private sector, especially in the area of raising the efficiency of existing nickel mining operations. Being still young, the nickel mining industry has a lot of room for improvement. Raising the efficiency of one mining operation might even bring more additional revenues than opening up a new nickel mine.

If the government, in partnership with the private sector, becomes successful in boosting efficiency and increasing the profitability of the mining operations, government revenues will automatically go up. Raising the efficiency of all 30 or so nickel mines might be equivalent to opening up 30 or so new nickel mines.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Previous Posts

    September 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    October 2023
    September 2023
    March 2023
    October 2021
    April 2021
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    March 2020
    November 2019
    August 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    October 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    November 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    March 2014

    Topics

    All
    2016
    Activities
    Benefical Ownership
    Coal
    CSO
    Eiti
    Mining
    NatCon
    National
    OGP
    Semirara
    Transparency

      Subscribe to Updates now!

    Subscribe to Newsletter

What We Do

Advocacy
Research
Subnational
​Capacity-Building

Know More

Photos
Presentations
Publication
Policies
Infographics
Modules​

About Us

Secretariat
History
Reports
Contact Us
Contact Us
[email protected]  | +(63) 917 5105 879
1402 West Trade Building, West Avenue,
​Brgy. Phil-Am, Quezon City, Philippines
  • Home
  • Updates
  • Resources
    • Videos
    • Presentations
    • Publications
    • Photos
    • Policies >
      • Current
      • Pending
    • Infographics
    • Modules
  • About Us